Monday, February 13, 2017

A&S Champions 2017

This past weekend I competed at Kingdom A&S Champions with my corset and hosen, and I have many things to say:

First, I'd like to thank Mistress Lissa and Master Magnus for running a great competition! Y'all clearly put a whole lot of effort into making this the best A&S ever.

Second, I was super honored to make it to the final 6, and to receive a Golden Lyre from Their Majesties. I'm so glad my passion for my work comes through in my presentation, even though I'm shy :) I was also very glad that many people stopped by for me to information fire-hose, I mean speak to about my project. It was great to get feedback in abundance.

Third, here are some pictures and my documentation for those who said they would love to read it later:

Documentation is here.






Wednesday, January 18, 2017

The dye oven

It's done!

Here was my process to build the dye oven (dye oven planning post can be found here):





-Stand the pot over the fire area. I used bricks and metal rods to build my stand, the same setup I had for dyeing over an open fire.

-Put the dye vat on its stand and start building a brick igloo around it.







-MORE BRICKS

















-Cover the holes in the brick structure as best you can with a mixture of clay, water, and straw/grass/etc.












-Put a door in place (I have a metal trough as a door)








Now set a fire under your pot and dye stuff!

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Adventures with weld and FIRE

Today I stuck a pot over a fire and dyed wool yellow. I had one of those "yesss I'm so period" moments standing in front of real fire.

First, fire. I constructed a stand for the pot out of bricks and spare rebar, which is at least plausibly period if not very pretty.

I then lit a whole bunch of wood on fire.

... and fed it more wood for a while.
Once the fire was established, I added my dye vat, with a mixture of weld, fustic, alum, and cream of tartar, all from period recipes for yellow. I added my pre-mordanted (with alum) white wool and cooked this for about an hour.
I then removed the pot from the fire to start cooling, leaving the fabric in the pot.
Several hours later, it is still cooling, but my formerly white wool is this screaming yellow color. SCIENCE.

Sunday, November 6, 2016

The Coat-Thing lives

I finished the "Coat-Thing" style of corset! (check out my theories on the enigmatic 14th century corset)

This is made with coat weight burgundy wool, lined in very nice faux fur because I couldn't afford that many pelts of anything. All visible stitching, including every edge and 41 buttonholes, by hand.

I really like the bezants. I am a 14th century disco ball. This was nice and warm at a chilly event.

Worn with my 100% hand sewn, hand dyed hood


Edit: This is what the pattern looks like. The outer wool pieces are laid out on the faux fur which must go all in the same direction, as it would if I had pieced pelts together. This pattern avoids any bias to bias seams and is very efficient

Sightings of Katheryn in the wild

I can be found on the EK Wiki, on Facebook, and in my Laurel's sewing room trying to SEW FASTER OR ELSE, APPRENTICE

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

"Nyce and Straunge": Less Common Ladies' Fashions of the 14th Century


The One True Century called, and it would like you to hear the good news about many potential new projects. Herein I will address both fashions which were uncommon in period (~1330-1410) as well as fashions which were more popular in period, but are rarely seen in recreations today. This list may sprout additional fashions or illustrations in the future.

Uncommon in Period
Two charming styles of headdress show up occasionally: the bycocket (Prince Phillip and Robin Hood's standard issue hat) and the wimple without a top veil.
The bycocket is more commonly seen on men, and as we know from my class "Drunken, Foolish, and Witless Women," masculine styles were daring fashion for women, and if too many were combined in one outfit, could be positively skanky.




Similarly, the wimple alone is conspicuously lacking the more common veil over the wimple arrangement, leaving the hair uncovered on top in an immodest fashion. Some of the examples wearing this style are women of questionable virtue, such as Delilah, shearing the hair of Samson.







Go look at all of Pinterest's 14th century images (I'll wait) and you will see a peculiar-seeming lack of necklaces. They just weren't that popular until ~1400, and even then many ladies aren't depicted in necklaces. I can only make educated guesses as to why this is. Necklaces may have been seen as too much conspicuous consumption, an unnecessary vanity that, piled on top of all the rich garments and jewels a lady might have on, was sinfully vain and wasteful. They may have just been unfashionable, too likely to be covered by wimples and hoods while they were popular, and only appeared when the wimple and closed hood had been rejected by fashion. It would be spectacularly pointless to own expensive jewels, only to cover them with most of your outfits. When the high-necked houppelande, which covers the neck and bosom unlike the lower-cut surcotes, appears, necklaces appear at about the same time - it would be perfectly modest to wear a necklace over your super-covering dress, and then you owned it already and could wear it with lower-necked garments.
Tacuinum sanitatis (Muckley) c. 1386






Now I will present all of the images I have of women wearing garments buttoned all the way to the floor. Spoiler: There's not a lot of them. Buttons much more commonly went down as far as the pelvis, closing an opening big enough to easily dress and undress through without having to spend more money and time on buttons down the skirt front. Buttons were frequently listed in royal accounts as separate jewelry, and may have been detachable from garments (there's many sets of 24 buttons mentioned a part of jewelry collections) which made it advisable to have 24 buttonholes on all of one's clothing. This efficient idea meant that one could have some very, very fancy buttons as they could be worn with multiple surcotes.





Again referencing those drunken, foolish, and witless women, dags were more of a masculine than a feminine fashion. It was daring or positively scandalous for a woman to have too much dagging on her garments because of this association. Here are some examples of dags both subtle and ludicrous.










Uncommonly Recreated
Formal apparel for the highest noblewomen was often more matchy-matchy than we like to dress as reenactors. The suit, a set of up to 4 matching garments (cote, surcote, hood, and/or mantle) was wildly popular, often being commissioned for extremely formal events, such as weddings, christenings, and churchings. The garments could then be worn in various combinations with the rest of one's wardrobe for a higher contrast look. It's much easier to find textual mentions of these, so here are some examples from Fashion in the Age of the Black Prince:

p. 34 "a suit of dark blue - ynde - velvet of particular magnificence was made for her (Queen Philippa) to wear. It consisted of a mantellium (mantle), capa (hood), open super tunic (surcote) and tunic (cote) embroidered with gold birds, each bird surrounded by a circle of large pearls, the whole background powdered with a pattern worked in silks and small pearls and enlivened by 10,000 doublets (faux gems)" (c. 1348)

"the queen's suit was again made of velvet, and again it was embroidered in gold, silk and pearls. This time the design consisted of oaks and other trees, beneath each of which was a lion, worked in large pearls, and again the whole ground was covered by a fine embroidery in silks and small pearls." (c. 1348)

p. 33 "a tunica (outer dress) and mantilletum (mantle) of heavy quality rakematiz, which was a thick imported silk woven with gold" for the wedding outfit of Princess Joan (wedding outfits often include only dress and mantle) "but she also had a whole suit made of the same stuff"

"a suit of red velvet" again for Joan







I have already pontificated on my theories of what the heck that "corset" thing is. I don't see too many of them being worn around (that I haven't directly pushed on people) because of their relative unpopularity in art, being less formal garments that patrons of art would consider too casual for fancy depictions of themselves. The "hunting surcote" and "Coat-Thing" models are both wonderfully practical. Images of these styles are in the corset writeup.

Behold, the CUFFS OF DEATH. These ridiculously long, full extensions of the cote sleeve are so fabric-consuming and hand-impairing that it is no wonder few people bother to inflict them on themselves, but they were all the rage c. ~1390-1420. Note that they flare from the wrist and are not "angel" sleeves hiding under the sleeves of the surcote.







Another outerwear option for the wealthy is the pelicon, a garment popular in the earlier half of the century. It is what happens when a hooded cloak has a baby with a poncho, which then grows to magnificently impractical proportions. Queens saw fit to be depicted in these, as their super-inefficient cut was both expensive and impractical enough to scream "I'M SWIMMING IN MONEY."
Joan of Burgundy, French, 1st half 14th c



The fur hat that turns up pretty frequently in Black Prince also appears in a few illustrations, though the illuminators don't bother to depict the insane amount of decoration that they could sport. These hats, made for the wealthy out of beaver fur, are another fashion worn by men, but seem to have not been too masculine as to be scandalous when combined with an otherwise proper outfit, as the princesses of England received these hats.


Wednesday, July 6, 2016

GNEW Classes

I am bringing a whole traveling circus 2 classes to GNEW!

They are:

The Gothic Ensemble
Baroness Katheryn Fontayne, OM
“I have my Gothic Fitted Dress (cote/cotehardie/kirtle) pattern, now what?” A guide for ladies c. 1350-1420 on what to do with that pattern – fabric choices, sleeve styles, accessories, your entire outfit. Extensive, color handout available online or in class for $5.
A&S 5, FRIDAY 2-3 Open to all

Drunken, Foolish, and Witless Women
Baroness Katheryn Fontayne, OM
Proper and Improper Dress for Ladies in the 14th Century. 14th century ladies’ dress conveyed a whole lot about their moral character. Come learn how to give the impression you want: impress God with your proper appearance, or lure some poor unsuspecting knight with your racy apparel. Extensive, color handout available online or in class for $5.
A&S 6, SATURDAY 3-4 Open to all

You can also download the handouts here:

The Gothic Ensemble handout

Drunken, Foolish, and Witless Women handout